Patrik Lindenfors, author, biology professor, and blogger for the Swedish Humanist Association, debates male circumcision and writes (in my translation):
The debate on circumcision is sensitive because it affects the rights of two of society’s vulnerable groups, the Jews and the Muslims, in contrast to the rights of another vulnerable group, the children. The Swedish Humanist Association and others advocate children’s rights (anyone can decide to be circumcision as an adult) while others advocate the rights of the group before the rights of the child.*
Now, I’m sure this is how Lindenfors sees it, but my defence of religious freedom—and thereby the right of Jews and Muslims to circumcise their sons—has nothing to do with collective rights before individual rights. On the contrary, a ban on a vital religious practice—unless it’s scientifically proven harmful or forced upon someone against their expressed will—is to forcefully assimilate individuals into the majority group. To ban circumcision would not protect the Jewish and Muslim boys from collectivism, it would only force their parents to bring their children up in accordance with the practice of society’s largest group, which in this case is Sweden’s cultural and secular Christians.
Freedom of religion was established as a human right and fundamental civil liberty in Europe precisely to prevent a government from abusing its powers by denying minority people their religious practice. This type of oppression was commonplace in old, pre-Enlightenment Europe, where kings and popes felt it necessary to forcefully help Jews and Muslims see the truth in Christianity. It’s both sad and ironic to see how human rights and civil liberties are now abused for much the same reason.
Read about it in Swedish at Humanistbloggen.
* The original text in Swedish: ”Omskärelsefrågan är känslig eftersom den handlar om rättigheterna hos två utsatta grupper i samhället, judar och muslimer, kontrasterat mot rättigheterna hos en annan utsatt grupp i samhället: barnen. Där Humanisterna och andra hävdar barnens rättigheter (vem som vill kan få omskära sig som vuxen) hävdar andra debattörer gruppernas rättigheter framför barnens.”